This country's score has stayed the same since 2014.
Recognition of animal sentience and prohibition of animal suffering
This goal assesses whether animal sentience has been recognised in legislation and explores the core legislative protections granted to animals, such as the prohibition of animal cruelty.
Animal Sentience is formally recognised in legislation
Although there is no legislation or policy that formally recognises animals as sentient beings, the Animal Welfare Act (2015) enshrines in law the Five Freedoms which recognise that animals feel pain and can suffer. The definition of ‘animal’ under the Animal Welfare Act (2015) includes ‘any living creature other than a human being and includes any beast, bird, aquatic animals, reptile or insect.’ Animals protected under the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) are explicitly excluded.The Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) covers ‘any species of wild animal or wild bird, whether totally protected or protected, vertebrate or invertebrate, live or dead, mature or immature and whether or not tamed or bred in captivity.’ Under this Act, wild animals are protected from pain and suffering (where unnecessary), fear and from inappropriate housing.The Malaysian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes explicitly states an animal’s quality of life is based on an assessment of their physical or psychological heath including a judgment about how the animal feels. Similarly, those using animals for research are required to consider the animal’s relationship to their environment as it implies a positive mental state.
While the Government of Malaysia has not explicitly recognised sentience in legislation, the inclusion of the Five Freedoms and recognition of the ability of all animals to feel pain and suffer both physically and psychologically is to be commended. That language considering how an animal feels and their mental state is used in regulation suggests an understanding and acceptance of animal sentience even if the term is not used explicitly.The Government is to be congratulated for launching a National Strategic Plan for Animal Welfare 2012 to 2020 as part of its collaboration with the OIE. One of the objectives of the plan is that ‘Malaysia as a developed nation (2020) will have a caring society that is concerned with animal welfare.’
Cruelty towards animals protected under the Animal Welfare Act (2015) is punishable by fine of 20-100,000 ringgit and/or imprisonment of up to three years.Cruelty towards animals protected under the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) is punishable by a fine of 5-50,000 ringgit and/or up to one-year imprisonment.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to amend both the Animal Welfare Act (2015) and Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) to explicitly recognise animals as sentient beings. At a minimum, all vertebrates, cephalopods and decapods crustaceans – are sentient beings and to enshrine this principle into legislation. A formal recognition of animal sentience will underpin further animal welfare measures.
Laws against causing animal suffering
The Animal Welfare Act (2015) establishes the Animal Welfare Board, whose role includes monitoring establishments, education on and promotion of animal welfare and providing animal welfare advice to ministers on any matters relating to animal welfare including the prevention of trauma, pain and suffering. The Act also creates a licence system for specific activities with animals such as transportation and slaughter, as well as a network of animal welfare officers.
Section 24 of the Animal Welfare Act (2015) enshrines the Five Freedoms in law as the duty of animal owners or holders of licenses. Section 26 of the Act specifically relates to animals used in research, testing or teaching and states that any pain or distress be reduced to the minimum.
Section 29 of the Animal Welfare Act (2015) includes 21 specific acts of cruelty that are prohibited. These include causing or allowing unnecessary pain and suffering, keeping animals chained or tethered using a short or heavy chain and animal abandonment. There are a few exceptions to the animal cruelty prohibitions, but they are limited and clearly defined. The Act goes further and specifically includes a list of animal activities covered by the legislation including performing animals, animal rescue and rehabilitation and strays.
However, the Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak have agreed to include only 90% of the Animal Welfare Act into their state laws. No detail as to exclusions could be found at the time of writing.
The Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) under Section 38, states that cruelty to wildlife both deliberate and through neglect includes individuals that ‘beats, kicks, infuriates, terrifies, tortures or declaws any wildlife.’ The Act also prohibits other activities that are cruel such as using snares or poison in hunting.
There are supplementary guidelines regarding euthanasia, however, due to lack of available translation at the time of writing, these were unable to be assessed for the Animal Protection Index.
Bestiality is banned under the Penal Code.
The Animal Welfare Act (2015) is detailed and widely applicable to animals in Malaysia, this should be commended. While sentience is not explicitly used, the inclusion of the phrase ‘prevention of trauma, pain and suffering’ suggests an understanding that animals are capable of suffering both physically and mentally. Furthermore, the establishment of the Animal Welfare Board is a positive step to ensuring Malaysia continues to improve its animal welfare. Similarly, the anti-cruelty provisions included in the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) aims to protect individual wild animals and is not just focused on the conservation of the species. Both Acts also include enforcement mechanisms throughout adding to the clarity of both.
It is concerning, however, that the Animal Welfare Act (2015) has not been enacted across the entire country. While, some states have agreed to enact most of the Act, it would be encouraging if the remaining 10% were also enshrined in law in these areas, given the strength of the Act. Similarly, it is concerning that neither the Malaysian Association of Zoological Gardens and Aquaria, nor animal any welfare organisations are represented on the Animal Welfare Board, although it is recognised that animal welfare organisations are represented on the Animal Welfare Consultation Committee which provides technical advice to the Board.
Conviction of bestiality could result in a prison sentence of up to twenty years, a fine or to whipping.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to include the Malaysian Association of Zoological Gardens and Aquaria and animal welfare organisations on the Animal Welfare Board.
Presence of animal welfare legislation
This goal explores animal protection laws in relation to various categories of animals, namely: farm animals, animals in captivity, companion animals, working animals and animals used for entertainment, animals used for scientific research and wild animals.
Protecting animals used in farming
The National Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2020 aimed to introduce Codes of Practice for livestock rearing and management, transportation of animals by air, land and sea and slaughter of livestock. However, at the time of writing, these Codes of Practice could not be located, and thus were unable to be assessed for the Animal Protection Index.
Rearing - pigs
Rearing - egg-laying hens
Rearing - dairy cattle and calves
As stated above, the proposed Code of Practice for Animal Welfare (Transport of animals by land, water and sea) was not located at the time of writing and therefore is unable to be assessed for the Animal Protection Index.
As stated above, the proposed Code of Practice for Animal Welfare (Slaughter of Livestock) was unable to be located at the time of writing and therefore is unable to be assessed for the Animal Protection Index.
Under the National Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2020, Codes of Practice detailing appropriate animal husbandry, transportation and slaughter were to be developed, however as they were not found at the time of writing, it is possible such codes of practice may align to OIE standards but are yet to be enshrined in law.
The practice of Halal slaughter without pre-stunning presents barriers to the improvement of animal welfare at slaughter. However, some improvements to welfare at slaughter can still be made within these restrictions.
• Due to the significant animal welfare concerns associated with long distance transport, the Government of Malaysia is strongly urged to ban the export of live animals for long distances (i.e. over than eight hours) and replace this practice with a meat only trade. Long distance transport is inherently cruel as it involves chronic stress for all animals and, for some species and modes of transport, it may involve overpopulation, exhaustion, excess heat or cold, inadequate ventilation and/or access to food and water, leading to disease, pain, injury or death. Similarly, the Government is encouraged to ensure animals entering Malaysia through live import are sourced from areas within eight hours of travel.
Protecting animals in captivity
Section 12 of the Wildlife Conservation (Operation of Zoo) Regulations, state that euthanasia may only be conducted by a veterinary surgeon or under the surgeon’s supervision. However, appropriate or humane methods of euthanasia are not mandated.
Wildlife shows within captive environments are further regulated under Section 13 and require written permission from the Director General in addition to the operating permit. Wildlife shows are only permitted if they are based in the natural behaviour of the species; do not involve force or abuse; and do not cause distress, pain or fear.
Malaysia also has a national association of zoos and aquariums which is a member of Southeast Asian Zoos and Aquariums Association.
In 2019, regulations relating to the care of wild animals in captivity were amended to introduce yearly auditing and inspections based on animal welfare, premise and personnel management.
Private keeping of wild animals
Proposed amendments to the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) would allow wild animal breeders to operate without having to obtain a business license and to allow them to sell animals throughout the year. These amendments are aimed at reducing the taking of wildlife from the wild.
However, Malaysia is a hub for the illegal wildlife trade and keeping wildlife as pets is on the increase. As of 2019, the Malaysian Government is working to amend the Wildlife Conservation Act to further protect wildlife from becoming pets.
While the breeding and keeping of wildlife is allowed under Malaysian law, individuals and organisations are required to have a permit to do so. Malaysia is a hub for the illegal wildlife trade and several high-profile individuals have shared pictures of their exotic pets via social media, fuelling demand in the country. This suggests current protections are not nearly enough. However, it is positive to see that the Malaysian Government has acknowledged the problem and is actively looking for a solution.
Given the prevalence of the illegal wildlife trade, it is concerning that the Government of Malaysia is looking to relax licensing laws for the breeding of captive wild animals. While the aims of such an amendment are to be commended, the relaxation of licensing may lead to increases in infringements of the Animal Welfare Act.
Furthermore, the lack of legislation around fur farming is concerning, since fur farming is inherently cruel.
Contravention of the Wildlife Conservation (Operation of Zoo) Regulations (2012) could result in a fine of up to 100,000 ringgit and/or imprisonment of up to 5 years.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to continue with plans to amend the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) to provide increased protections for wildlife to stop the illegal wildlife trade in Malaysia.
Protecting companion animals
Care of companion animals
While there are no policies or laws relating specifically to companion animal care, companion animals are comprehensively protected by the Animal Welfare Act (2015). The Act enshrines the Five Freedoms in law but also includes prohibitions for acts of cruelty which most often affect companion animals. This includes total bans on tail docking, declawing, animal abandonment and animal fighting.
The Government has been proactive in running public awareness campaigns on responsible pet ownership including fifty in 2019 alone. The Government of Malaysia should be praised for such campaigns.
There is some delegated authority in Malaysia and in the state of Sarawak, under the Local Authorities (Dog Licensing and Control) Bylaws 2018 , free-roaming dogs can be seized and held by local authorities. If unclaimed after 48 hours, the dog shall be euthanised.
Rabies occurs in Malaysia and, as such, there is mandatory dog licencing and vaccinations in the ‘immune-belt area’ to ensure the disease does not spread to the rest of the country. Rabies vaccinations have since been made mandatory across the country.
The Government is currently developing new Animal Welfare (Licensing) Regulations including for animal rescue and rehabilitation, for activities relating to animal pounds and shelters and for stray animal control.
• The Government is strongly urged to ban culling. Culling has been scientifically proven to be ineffective in population and rabies control.
• The Government of Malaysia is strongly encouraged to engage with the International Companion Animal Management (ICAM) coalition to learn about and implement their dog population management methodology. This methodology consists of a full cycle of action addressing root causes of conflict between roaming dogs and communities. The document is helpful to governments to manage dogs humanely as well as to help communities to live in harmony with dogs.
• The Government of Malaysia is strongly encouraged to set out clear animal welfare criteria, which animal breeders must fulfil prior to being granted the authorisation to commercially breed and trade companion animals. Furthermore, the Government of Malaysia is encouraged to provide financial and human resources for regular inspections of facilities breeding and caring for companion animals including pet shops.
• The Government of Malaysia is urged to include animal welfare organisations on the Animal Welfare Board to ensure animal welfare is the highest priority in new regulations and legislation.
Protecting animals used for draught and recreation
Animals used in entertainment
The Wildlife Conservation (Operation of Zoo) Regulations (2012) that permits wildlife shows within captive environments. These wildlife shows are further regulated under Section 13 and require written permission from the Director General in addition to the operating permit. Wildlife shows are only permitted if they are based in the natural behaviour of the species; do not involve force or abuse; and do not cause distress, pain or fear.
Activities such as animal riding are regulated under the Animal Welfare Act (2015). Animal fighting and baiting, rodeos, some forms of shooting and any sport or activity where animals are subject to cruelty either during the sport or activity itself or in training are completely banned.
There is supporting legislation regarding equines in competition, however, a translation could not be found at the time of writing.
The Government of Malaysia is commended for its complete ban on animal fights and baiting.
The protections for draught animals are limited. While the Animal Welfare Act (2015) prohibits work that results in suffering for draught animal, the direction is vague. There are no supplementary regulations to provide clarification for enforcement and animal owners.
The Wildlife Conservation Act also includes enforcement mechanisms with offences resulting in fines of up to 100,000 ringgit and/or up to five years in prison.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to amend the Animal Welfare Act (2015) and the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) to ensure alignment to safeguard protections for wild animals in entertainment and remove confusion.
• The Government of Malaysia is strongly encouraged to adopt specific regulations to address the welfare of working animals, aligned with the OIE’s animal welfare standards, where possible. Regulations should also address animals such as working dogs.
Protecting animals used in scientific research
Animals in scientific research are further regulated through the Malaysian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (2010). This Code of Practice was adapted from the Australian Code of Practice for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes. The Malaysian Code of Practice (2010) states its purpose as ensuring ‘the ethical and humane care and use of animals.’ The Code of Practice also states that it is the responsibility of researchers and institutions to ensure the welfare of animals is always considered, to promote the development and use of techniques that replace the use of animals, to minimize the number of animals used and to refine methods and procedures to avoid pain or distress in animals. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees are required under the Code of Practice to adhere to the Three Rs principles – Replacement, Reduction and Refinement. The Three Rs principles are clearly defined within the Code of Practice and promote needs consideration on a species-by-species basis.
Under the Malaysian Code of Practice (2010), an animal’s mental state, their physical and psychological health and how the animal feels are all required to be considered. Similarly, the code of practice provides clear definitions for animal welfare, animal wellbeing and distress.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees are held responsible to some degree for the animals under their institutions care. They are required to approve guidelines for the care of animals that are used and to monitor the acquisition, transportation, production, housing, care, use and fate of animals. Part of their responsibility includes physical inspections of animal care facilities every 6 months, including satellite facilities.
The Malaysian Code of Practice (2010) is clear in respect to animal welfare during experiments. Anaesthesia and analgesia are mandatory for almost all procedures, and Section 3.4.4 lists potential behaviour and physiological changes that may indicate pain or distress in animals. Furthermore, for experiments regarding animal behaviour modification severe deprivation of food, water, social interaction, and sensory stimuli are banned. When an animal is required to be euthanised, it must be done using humane methods, avoiding pain and distress, being reliable and producing rapid loss of consciousness.
Finally, the Malaysian Code of Practice (2010) also separately details requirements for wild animal species, including both ‘free-living’ and wild captured. The Code of Practice is applicable to observational studies in the wild as well as laboratory-based research. Studies on wildlife require additional permissions from the Department of Wildlife, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. It is mandated that animals should not be taken from the wild unless animals bred in captivity are unavailable or unsuitable. Capture methods should minimise distress, and the animal’s wellbeing must be protected; this includes limiting how long animals remain in traps, protection from the elements, and consideration of impact on social structures or dependent young. There are extra considerations stated for non-human primates, including the importance of social interaction.
There is no ban on testing cosmetics and its ingredients on animals in Malaysia.
The Malaysian Code of Practice on the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (2012) is clear, detailed and extensive. It provides guidance on various animal care and husbandry issues and is definitive in its recognition of the importance of an animal’s physical, psychological and social needs. It is positive that this Code of Practice includes the Three Rs principles – Replacement, Reduction, Refinement.
However, there are several concerns, namely that testing of cosmetics and its ingredients is permitted, as is the capture of animals from the wild for scientific research.
However, the Malaysian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (2010) does not contain any enforcement mechanism.
• The Government is urged to ban taking animals from the wild for the purpose of scientific research.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to mandate the rehoming of animals used in research, testing or teaching.
Protecting the welfare of wild animals
The Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) is relevant to this category of animals, although from a welfare point of view, there are some contradictions in this legislation. Hunting is permitted under licence, although there are some welfare-related restrictions, such as a prohibition on the use of snares and use of poison (section 29). Section 86 prohibits cruelty to wildlife, but the use of birdlime (adhesive) is permitted, with approval from the Director for Wildlife and National Parks, when birds are damaging crops (section 53).
The Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) authorises wildlife officers to enforce the Act, and gives them powers including confiscation, search and seizure, and inspection (Part 8 of the Act).
Several species including Javan and Sumatran Rhino, Tigers and Clouded Leopards are not allowed to be hunted under any circumstances.
While the definition of ‘animal’ under the Animal Welfare Act (2015) includes ‘any living creature other than a human being and includes any beast, bird, aquatic animals, reptile or insect,’ but this does not include wildlife due to protections under the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010).
There is some level of protection for Malaysian wildlife, however there is room for improvement. Most protection is for entire species of animals from a conservation point of view rather than considering the welfare of individual animals. The prohibition on the use of snares is a positive step in avoiding cruel hunting practices. An improvement in minimum standards of welfare for all wild animals targeted by man could help to promote the protection of wild animals to become a mainstream concern of society. The requirement of obtaining a permit for entry to, and the prohibition on activities within, wildlife reserves (sections 48 and 49 of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010) may assist in creating mainstream community concern for the preservation of wildlife within these sanctuaries.
The Government appears willing to provide both human and financial resources to improving welfare in this field, particularly for animals that are endangered and protected, but further clarity is needed to understand the legal status of other animals in this category. There appears to be cross-over between the Animal Welfare Act (2015) and the Wildlife Conservation Act (2010), and thus it is unclear which animals fall under which jurisdiction.
Section 89 of the Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 states that offences under the Act will be deemed a sizeable offence (capable of arrest without warrant) for the purposes of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Director General may authorise any officer to exercise the powers of enforcement under this Act (section 90).
The Wildlife Conservation Act also includes enforcement mechanisms with offences resulting in fines of up to 100,000 ringgit and/or up to five years in prison.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to ban any form of hunting that does not directly support subsistence i.e. for feeding oneself and one’s family and not for commercial gain. Subsistence hunting operations must employ the least cruel methods of hunting and slaughter, and that all possible efforts should be made to reduce the time to death of animals killed in these hunts. At a minimum, the Government is strongly encouraged to prohibit the cruellest hunting methods.
• The Government is encouraged to collaborate with animal welfare organisations in order to define and implement humane alternatives to the eradication of animals considered as ‘pests.’
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged, at a minimum, to implement a revised hunting permit licence, which would be delivered after successful completion of a test by which applicants would be required to show their knowledge of hunting methods where animal suffering can be minimised. Hunters’ knowledge of species should also be assessed, so that their activities do not undermine conservation efforts.
Establishment of supportive government bodies
This goal examines government commitment to animal protection. This includes whether there is allocation of responsibility, accountability and resources within government to protect animals.
Government accountability for animal welfare
Responsibility for animal welfare falls between the Ministry of Agriculture & Agro-based Industry and the Ministry of Natural Resource and Environment.
The Animal Welfare Act (2015) established the Animal Welfare Board whose role includes monitoring establishments, education on and promotion of animal welfare and providing animal welfare advice to ministers on any matters relating to animal welfare including the prevention of trauma, pain and suffering. The Act also establishes a licence system for specific activities with animals such as transportation and slaughter, as well as a network of animal welfare officers. While the Animal Welfare Board is made up of representatives from a number of government ministries and departments, there is a lack of animal welfare expertise included.
Since 2012, the Government of Malaysia has been working under the guise of the National Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2020. Since 2014 and the last iteration of the Animal Protection Index, the Government has produced, as outlined in the Animal Welfare Strategy, many of its proposed objectives. From 2018-2020, the strategy has entered the consolidation phase which involves many reviews and improvements to recently introduced and implemented legislation and regulations. At the time of writing, the review process was underway and thus conclusions and future improvements were unable to be assessed for the Animal Protection Index.
Both the Animal Welfare Act (2015) and Wildlife Conservation Act (2010) as well as supplementary legislation firmly places responsibility for enforcement of animal welfare law and promotion of good animal welfare more generally on the Government. While there is duty of care for individual animals placed on owners and licence holders; the education, training and adherence to the law of animal owners and licence holders is down to the Government at national, state and local levels. The Animal Welfare Board is named as responsible for the administration, enforcement and implementation of the Animal Welfare Act (2015).
However, given the split jurisdiction for animal protections between two government ministries, there is the possibility for confusion or for groups of animals to not be provided sufficient animal welfare provisions. For example, while the Animal Welfare Act (2015) provides regulations for animals in performances, wildlife are not protected under this Act. Given that wildlife often suffer horrendously through being forced to ‘perform’, it is difficult to assign responsibility for their welfare to one or other government ministries.
The Government of Malaysia should be commended for its commitment to improving animal welfare. While there are improvements to be made, the financial and human resources set in place by the National Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2020 as well as the introduction of new legislation across several industries for improvement shows a strong political will for good animal welfare across the country.
The Animal Welfare Board is responsible for ensuring the enforcement of animal welfare legislation and there is a delegated authority to appropriate ministries at state level.
• The Government of Malaysia is encouraged to align all animal welfare legislation and supplementary regulations under one government ministry to ensure all animals are protected in a unified manner.
• The Government of Malaysia is strongly encouraged to continue on the path set out by the National Animal Welfare Strategy through 2020 and beyond. The Government’s commitment to animal welfare is to be commended and held up as an example to other countries.
Support for international animal welfare standards
This goal looks at whether the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)’s animal welfare standards have been incorporated into law or policy, and whether the Government is supportive of the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare.
OIE animal welfare standards
The OIE Animal Welfare Standards focus on transport, slaughter, production systems (beef cattle, broiler chickens, dairy cattle, pigs), stray dog population control, the use of animals in research and education, and working equids.
Some of the OIE’s animal welfare standards appear to have been adopted in Malaysian legislation, for example the inclusion of the Five Freedoms in the Animal Welfare Act (2015). Those responsible for animals are required to fulfil the needs of the animal for a suitable environment and diet, to be able to exhibit normal behaviour patterns, to be housed with or apart from other animals and to be protected from pain, suffering, injury and disease (section 24).
The regulations regarding dog population management, specifically dog culling, are not necessarily aligned with OIE standards on animal welfare. While the OIE accepts that euthanasia of strays may be required, it is a last resort for animals that cannot be rehomed. Adoption and rehoming should be prioritised according to OIE standards.
Unfortunately, due to lack of available translation, many supplementary regulations, for example in relation to transport and slaughter, have been unable to be assessed for their alignment with OIE animal welfare standards.
The Malaysian Department of Veterinary Services commented in a presentation available on the OIE’s website that, with respect to the OIE standards, most air animal transports are in compliance with OIE standards and that animal welfare standards during transport by land have improved tremendously over the years.
The Government has a good level of engagement with the OIE regionally. Under RAWS (the OIE’s Regional Animal Welfare Strategy, which involves countries from Asia, the Far East and Oceania), Malaysia has launched a National Animal Welfare Strategic Plan for 2012 to 2020, including expenditure of up to 80 million ringgit in order to improve welfare.
While the Malaysian Government has made strides to align animal welfare legislation and regulations with OIE animal welfare standards, this has not been consistent. Many regulations introduced before the Animal Welfare Act (2015) and the National Animal Welfare Strategy are yet to be aligned with OIE standards and the Government’s ambitions for animal welfare in Malaysia.
The Animal Welfare Act (2015) includes multiple enforcement mechanisms, depending on offence committed. Anyone found guilty of committing an offence under the Animal Welfare Act may be barred from holding a licence for animal activities for up to five years or may be barred from owning or keeping animals. Fines ranges from 10-100,000 ringgit and offences could result in up to three years imprisonment.
• At present, OIE standards are only partially implemented in Malaysia’s legislation. In particular, standards for farm animals and stray animals are not fully aligned to OIE animal welfare standards. Therefore, the Government of Malaysia is strongly encouraged to enact mandatory guidelines for these species, in accordance with the OIE’s animal welfare standards and guidelines.
Support for the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare
The King of Malaysia and the Malaysian Ministry for Agriculture pledged support in principle for the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare in September 2008.
Note: The Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare is a proposed formal international acknowledgment of a set of principles giving animal welfare due recognition among governments and the international community. An expression of support for the UDAW demonstrates a government’s commitment to working with the international community to improve animal welfare.
Malaysia’s support of the UDAW is reflected in the Animal Welfare Act (2015), as this incorporates principles from the UDAW. This support means that the government can use the document to guide future decision-making processes regarding animal welfare in Malaysia. While animal sentience has not yet been recognised formally in legislation, the principles of the Five Freedoms are recognised throughout current legislation.
The UDAW requires that all appropriate steps shall be taken by states to prevent cruelty to animals and prevent their suffering (at point 3). The dramatic increase in severity for penalties for animal cruelty from the Animals Act (1953) to the Animal Welfare Act (2015) shows that the government is seeking to provide a stronger incentive to protect animals through enforcement and penalties for non-compliance.
There are no enforcement mechanisms relevant to this indicator.
• Malaysia has provided full government support to UDAW, through a declaration from the King of Malaysia and the Ministry of Agriculture. Malaysia should act as an example for other countries to pledge support in principle to UDAW.